Re: [llvm-dev] __parityti2(), __paritydi2() and __paritysi2() vs. __builtin_parity
I don't believe clang/llvm will ever emit a call to the parity library routines today. But it might be needed so we can say that we match the libgcc interface. gcc doesn't use it for x86 either as far as I know. And I don't know if they have it in their x86 libgcc. But it might be easier for compiler-rt to be a superset of libgcc rather than trying to track exactly what they have on each target.
Not sure about the inlining question.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:51 AM Stefan Kanthak via llvm-dev <[hidden email]> wrote: