On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Dan Gohman wrote:
> What's the purpose of the TargetSubtarget class? It appears the only users
> of getSubtarget are in the target-specific code, where the abstraction is
> Is it just a way to encourage targets to follow a nice pattern of keeping
> subtarget state in a separate class, or are there grand plans?
It is just a pattern that we recommend targets to follow.