[3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
26 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Hans Wennborg-2
Hello testers,

RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch).

RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed
in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap
problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4.

Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release.

Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual.

Thanks,
Hans
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Renato Golin-2
On 18 February 2015 at 23:26, Hans Wennborg <[hidden email]> wrote:
> RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed
> in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap
> problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4.

Ok, this issue might not have been solved... The test:

test/CodeGen/R600/Output/infinite-loop-evergreen.ll

Is actually in an infinite loop on AArch64... This is RC4 Phase3. I
didn't see that on RC3.

I'll kill the test and proceed with the test-suite, but I'm not sure
we found all problems.

cheers,
--renato
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Renato Golin-2
On 19 February 2015 at 13:57, Renato Golin <[hidden email]> wrote:
> test/CodeGen/R600/Output/infinite-loop-evergreen.ll
>
> Is actually in an infinite loop on AArch64... This is RC4 Phase3. I
> didn't see that on RC3.

Well, I spoke too early. Apparently the test finished after 8 minutes
running... Is that expected?

8 minutes is longer than it takes to run the whole check-all on that box...

cheers,
--renato
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Renato Golin-2
In reply to this post by Hans Wennborg-2
On 18 February 2015 at 23:26, Hans Wennborg <[hidden email]> wrote:
> RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch).

AArch64 binaries uploaded. Apart from the long-lasting infinite-loop
test, everything else was fine.

ARM binaries still building.

cheers,
--renato
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Dimitry Andric
On 19 Feb 2015, at 15:28, Renato Golin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> On 18 February 2015 at 23:26, Hans Wennborg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch).
>
> AArch64 binaries uploaded. Apart from the long-lasting infinite-loop
> test, everything else was fine.
>
> ARM binaries still building.

No problems encountered on FreeBSD 10.  I have uploaded these files to SFTP:

SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-i386-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = e38ff54a9fb9fbe20751c08783821bcc3416eb1961a799e1099857c456d9f396
SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = 161e187eeb790a52fb07b508485c89f214dbcd03794e0cdff522cae97610e889

-Dimitry


_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

signature.asc (201 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Hans Wennborg-2
In reply to this post by Renato Golin-2
+Matt who wrote that test.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Renato Golin <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On 19 February 2015 at 13:57, Renato Golin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> test/CodeGen/R600/Output/infinite-loop-evergreen.ll
>>
>> Is actually in an infinite loop on AArch64... This is RC4 Phase3. I
>> didn't see that on RC3.
...
> Well, I spoke too early. Apparently the test finished after 8 minutes
> running... Is that expected?

There weren't any R600 patches merged between rc3 and rc4.. I think
the test is just broken and you got unlucky with this build.

If I remove the XFAIL, the test fails for me by hitting an unreachable
in AMDILCFGStructurizer.cpp. The behaviour feels a little arbitrary.
Who knows what would happen in a non-asserts bug, and what the test
expectation really is.

I'm not going to worry about this one for the release.

Cheers,
Hans
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Hans Wennborg-2
In reply to this post by Hans Wennborg-2
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Hans Wennborg <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hello testers,
>
> RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch).
>
> RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed
> in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap
> problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4.
>
> Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release.
>
> Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual.
Windows binary uploaded to the sftp:

$ sha1sum LLVM-3.6.0-rc4-win32.exe
4ae208f78c403c00cccdd9a65020df4ac277f189  LLVM-3.6.0-rc4-win32.exe

It was built with the attached script.

 - Hans

_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

build_llvm_360._bat_ (3K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Renato Golin-2
In reply to this post by Hans Wennborg-2
On 19 February 2015 at 17:15, Hans Wennborg <[hidden email]> wrote:
> There weren't any R600 patches merged between rc3 and rc4.. I think
> the test is just broken and you got unlucky with this build.

Yeah, I think I just didn't see it in time.


> I'm not going to worry about this one for the release.

Ok.

cheers,
--renato
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Renato Golin-2
In reply to this post by Renato Golin-2
On 19 February 2015 at 14:28, Renato Golin <[hidden email]> wrote:
> AArch64 binaries uploaded. Apart from the long-lasting infinite-loop
> test, everything else was fine.

ARM binaries up. All green.

--renato
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Matt Arsenault-2
In reply to this post by Hans Wennborg-2

> On Feb 19, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Hans Wennborg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> +Matt who wrote that test.
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Renato Golin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On 19 February 2015 at 13:57, Renato Golin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> test/CodeGen/R600/Output/infinite-loop-evergreen.ll
>>>
>>> Is actually in an infinite loop on AArch64... This is RC4 Phase3. I
>>> didn't see that on RC3.
> ...
>> Well, I spoke too early. Apparently the test finished after 8 minutes
>> running... Is that expected?
>
> There weren't any R600 patches merged between rc3 and rc4.. I think
> the test is just broken and you got unlucky with this build.
>
> If I remove the XFAIL, the test fails for me by hitting an unreachable
> in AMDILCFGStructurizer.cpp. The behaviour feels a little arbitrary.
> Who knows what would happen in a non-asserts bug, and what the test
> expectation really is.

The point is basically to record this is broken so somebody notices in the future if this gets fixed. What the test does doesn’t really matter. It crashes immediately for me with the unreachable.


>
> I'm not going to worry about this one for the release.
>
> Cheers,
> Hans


_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Ben Pope
In reply to this post by Hans Wennborg-2
On Thursday, February 19, 2015 07:26 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote:

> Hello testers,
>
> RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch).
>
> RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed
> in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap
> problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4.
>
> Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release.
>
> Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual.
>
Everything looks fine on x86_64 ubuntu-14.04

Uploaded: clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz

Ben
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Nikola Smiljanic
Fedora and openSUSE look good, upload in progress...

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Ben Pope <[hidden email]> wrote:
On Thursday, February 19, 2015 07:26 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote:
Hello testers,

RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch).

RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed
in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap
problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4.

Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release.

Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual.

Everything looks fine on x86_64 ubuntu-14.04

Uploaded: clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz

Ben


_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Daniel Sanders
In reply to this post by Hans Wennborg-2
Mips binaries uploaded.

clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz
        All good

clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz
        Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a broken symlink to the test-suite source). Second attempt is a fair way through and looks good so far though

clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz (cross compiling to Mips)
        Everything was fine until my disk filled up after 14 of the 23 configs I run. I'll rerun those that didn't run first time.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
> Of Hans Wennborg
> Sent: 18 February 2015 23:27
> To: Ben Pope; Renato Golin; Sylvestre Ledru; Dimitry Andric; Sebastian
> Dreßler; Daniel Sanders; Nikola Smiljanić
> Cc: llvmdev; cfe-dev
> Subject: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged
>
> Hello testers,
>
> RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch).
>
> RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed
> in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap
> problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4.
>
> Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release.
>
> Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual.
>
> Thanks,
> Hans

_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Nikola Smiljanic
Renato and Daniel, how are you guys testing, are you using real hardware or emulation? I'm just curious about your setup.

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Daniel Sanders <[hidden email]> wrote:
Mips binaries uploaded.

clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz
        All good

clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz
        Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a broken symlink to the test-suite source). Second attempt is a fair way through and looks good so far though

clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz (cross compiling to Mips)
        Everything was fine until my disk filled up after 14 of the 23 configs I run. I'll rerun those that didn't run first time.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
> Of Hans Wennborg
> Sent: 18 February 2015 23:27
> To: Ben Pope; Renato Golin; Sylvestre Ledru; Dimitry Andric; Sebastian
> Dreßler; Daniel Sanders; Nikola Smiljanić
> Cc: llvmdev; cfe-dev
> Subject: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged
>
> Hello testers,
>
> RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch).
>
> RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed
> in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap
> problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4.
>
> Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release.
>
> Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual.
>
> Thanks,
> Hans


_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Renato Golin-2
On 23 February 2015 at 10:46, Nikola Smiljanic <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Renato and Daniel, how are you guys testing, are you using real hardware or
> emulation? I'm just curious about your setup.

Hi Nikola,

I use real hardware. I'm relying on the check-all from Phase3 and
running the whole test-suite cleanly. On RC1 of every release, I run
some benchmarks to track performance regressions, and make sure we can
still run the same benchmarks on ARM/AArch64, since we don't have
buildbots for them.

cheers,
--renato
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

sebastian.dressler
In reply to this post by Hans Wennborg-2
Hi everyone,

I'm a bit late but nevertheless: uploaded RC4 for OS X to SFTP with
lights on green

MD5 (clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz) =
7a1d49b04f889d70b07ff8e4fc42a2f3


Cheers,
Sebastian


2015-02-19 0:26 GMT+01:00 Hans Wennborg <[hidden email]>:

> Hello testers,
>
> RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch).
>
> RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed
> in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap
> problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4.
>
> Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release.
>
> Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual.
>
> Thanks,
> Hans
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Daniel Sanders
In reply to this post by Nikola Smiljanic

The Mips binary releases are built and tested on Mips hardware Debian Jessie (mips/mipsel) systems. The little-endian system lacks a local hard disk and an FPU so it takes a _very_ long time. The big-endian system still lacks an FPU but it has an SSD and 10 cores so it's pretty quick. Each of these are tested for –mips32, -mips32r2, and default-options. I don't look at the performance of the test-suite yet since the lack of FPU's means that a lot of the tests are really testing the performance of the kernel instruction emulation (2% user 98% sys is pretty common). However, I discovered a few days ago that the 'MIPS Creator CI20' is pretty good at the test-suite (it has an FPU and finishes in ~2 hours) so I'm hoping to have this in place for future releases.

I'm not doing 64-bit builds yet because of a couple issues recursing the compiler with the release script but it's hopefully on its way.

 

The cross compilation testing builds the test-suite several times (currently 23) for various ISA's, endians, ABI's, etc. and executes the tests under qemu. This lets me cover things I don't have the silicon for at the moment (e.g. Mips32r6, MSA, etc.) but it also prevents meaningful performance testing. I'm hoping to get hardware involved in this where possible but I haven't had time to look into it.

 

From: Nikola Smiljanic [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: 23 February 2015 10:46
To: Daniel Sanders
Cc: Hans Wennborg; Ben Pope; Renato Golin; Sylvestre Ledru; Dimitry Andric; Sebastian Dreßler; llvmdev; cfe-dev
Subject: Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

 

Renato and Daniel, how are you guys testing, are you using real hardware or emulation? I'm just curious about your setup.

 

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Daniel Sanders <[hidden email]> wrote:

Mips binaries uploaded.

clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz
        All good

clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz
        Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a broken symlink to the test-suite source). Second attempt is a fair way through and looks good so far though

clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz (cross compiling to Mips)
        Everything was fine until my disk filled up after 14 of the 23 configs I run. I'll rerun those that didn't run first time.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
> Of Hans Wennborg
> Sent: 18 February 2015 23:27
> To: Ben Pope; Renato Golin; Sylvestre Ledru; Dimitry Andric; Sebastian
> Dreßler; Daniel Sanders; Nikola Smiljanić
> Cc: llvmdev; cfe-dev
> Subject: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged
>
> Hello testers,
>
> RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch).
>
> RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed
> in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap
> problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4.
>
> Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release.
>
> Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual.
>
> Thanks,
> Hans

 


_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Hans Wennborg-2
In reply to this post by sebastian.dressler
I've added them to the pre-release webpage.

Cheers,
Hans

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Sebastian Dreßler
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm a bit late but nevertheless: uploaded RC4 for OS X to SFTP with
> lights on green
>
> MD5 (clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz) =
> 7a1d49b04f889d70b07ff8e4fc42a2f3
>
>
> Cheers,
> Sebastian
>
>
> 2015-02-19 0:26 GMT+01:00 Hans Wennborg <[hidden email]>:
>> Hello testers,
>>
>> RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch).
>>
>> RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed
>> in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap
>> problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4.
>>
>> Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release.
>>
>> Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hans

_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Daniel Sanders
In reply to this post by Daniel Sanders
Quick update before I move on to the final tag.

> clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz
> Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a broken
> symlink to the test-suite source). Second attempt is a fair way through and
> looks good so far though

Default options were all good. Mips32 was about halfway but was good so far.

> clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz (cross compiling
> to Mips)
> Everything was fine until my disk filled up after 14 of the 23 configs I
> run. I'll rerun those that didn't run first time.

All ok here.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]]
> On Behalf Of Daniel Sanders
> Sent: 23 February 2015 10:41
> To: Hans Wennborg; Ben Pope; Renato Golin; Sylvestre Ledru; Dimitry Andric;
> Sebastian Dreßler; Nikola Smiljanić
> Cc: cfe-dev; llvmdev
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged
>
> Mips binaries uploaded.
>
> clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz
> All good
>
> clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz
> Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a broken
> symlink to the test-suite source). Second attempt is a fair way through and
> looks good so far though
>
> clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz (cross compiling
> to Mips)
> Everything was fine until my disk filled up after 14 of the 23 configs I
> run. I'll rerun those that didn't run first time.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On
> Behalf
> > Of Hans Wennborg
> > Sent: 18 February 2015 23:27
> > To: Ben Pope; Renato Golin; Sylvestre Ledru; Dimitry Andric; Sebastian
> > Dreßler; Daniel Sanders; Nikola Smiljanić
> > Cc: llvmdev; cfe-dev
> > Subject: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged
> >
> > Hello testers,
> >
> > RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch).
> >
> > RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed
> > in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap
> > problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4.
> >
> > Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to
> release.
> >
> > Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hans
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> [hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged

Hayden Livingston
Are we waiting for an RC5? It seems like the release mirror on github has no recent activity.

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Daniel Sanders <[hidden email]> wrote:
Quick update before I move on to the final tag.

> clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz
>       Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a broken
> symlink to the test-suite source). Second attempt is a fair way through and
> looks good so far though

Default options were all good. Mips32 was about halfway but was good so far.

> clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz (cross compiling
> to Mips)
>       Everything was fine until my disk filled up after 14 of the 23 configs I
> run. I'll rerun those that didn't run first time.

All ok here.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]]
> On Behalf Of Daniel Sanders
> Sent: 23 February 2015 10:41
> To: Hans Wennborg; Ben Pope; Renato Golin; Sylvestre Ledru; Dimitry Andric;
> Sebastian Dreßler; Nikola Smiljanić
> Cc: cfe-dev; llvmdev
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged
>
> Mips binaries uploaded.
>
> clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz
>       All good
>
> clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz
>       Still running due to a silly setup mistake on the first run (a broken
> symlink to the test-suite source). Second attempt is a fair way through and
> looks good so far though
>
> clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz (cross compiling
> to Mips)
>       Everything was fine until my disk filled up after 14 of the 23 configs I
> run. I'll rerun those that didn't run first time.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On
> Behalf
> > Of Hans Wennborg
> > Sent: 18 February 2015 23:27
> > To: Ben Pope; Renato Golin; Sylvestre Ledru; Dimitry Andric; Sebastian
> > Dreßler; Daniel Sanders; Nikola Smiljanić
> > Cc: llvmdev; cfe-dev
> > Subject: [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged
> >
> > Hello testers,
> >
> > RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch).
> >
> > RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed
> > in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap
> > problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4.
> >
> > Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to
> release.
> >
> > Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries as usual.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hans
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> [hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev


_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
12