3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
36 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Tom Stellard-3
Hi,

I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can begin.  We can always use
more testers, so if you are interested in testing, let me know.

-Tom
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Ben Pope
On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 09:07 AM, Ben Pope wrote:

> On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 08:17 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can begin.  We can always use
>> more testers, so if you are interested in testing, let me know.
>
> I checked out the test-release script from 3.6.2 rc1 tag:
>
> /home/development/llvm/3.6.2# ./release_tools/test-release.sh -release
> 3.6.2 -rc 1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -no-64bit# Validating llvm SVN URL
> # Validating cfe SVN URL
> # Validating dragonegg SVN URL
> dragonegg 3.6.2 release candidate rc1 doesn't exist!

But checked out from trunk, it appears to be progressing.

Ben


_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Tom Stellard-3
In reply to this post by Tom Stellard-3
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 09:07:23AM +0800, Ben Pope wrote:

> On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 08:17 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can begin.  We can always use
> > more testers, so if you are interested in testing, let me know.
>
> I checked out the test-release script from 3.6.2 rc1 tag:
>
> /home/development/llvm/3.6.2# ./release_tools/test-release.sh -release
> 3.6.2 -rc 1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -no-64bit# Validating llvm SVN URL
> # Validating cfe SVN URL
> # Validating dragonegg SVN URL
> dragonegg 3.6.2 release candidate rc1 doesn't exist!
>

This should be fixed now.  I tagged the release candidates using
tag.sh from trunk, which had dragonegg removed.

-Tom

> Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Renato Golin-2
In reply to this post by Ben Pope
On 24 June 2015 at 14:15, Ben Pope <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Looks good: clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz

So far so good:

clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.xz
clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-armv7a-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz

cheers,
--renato
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Hans Wennborg-2
In reply to this post by Tom Stellard-3
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Tom Stellard <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can begin.  We can always use
> more testers, so if you are interested in testing, let me know.

I had trouble building on Windows, getting errors in
AMDGPUGenSubtargetInfo.inc about 'uint64_t' being unrecognized. It
seems after r240285, FeatureWavefrontSize16 etc. changed from being
enumerators to uint64_t values.

If I add "#include "llvm/Support/DataTypes.h"" to
AMDGPUMCTargetDesc.h, it builds. Can I go ahead and commit that to the
branch?
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Tom Stellard-3
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:11:26AM -0700, Hans Wennborg wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Tom Stellard <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can begin.  We can always use
> > more testers, so if you are interested in testing, let me know.
>
> I had trouble building on Windows, getting errors in
> AMDGPUGenSubtargetInfo.inc about 'uint64_t' being unrecognized. It
> seems after r240285, FeatureWavefrontSize16 etc. changed from being
> enumerators to uint64_t values.
>
> If I add "#include "llvm/Support/DataTypes.h"" to
> AMDGPUMCTargetDesc.h, it builds. Can I go ahead and commit that to the
> branch?

Yes, that's fine.

-Tom
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Hans Wennborg-2
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Tom Stellard <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:11:26AM -0700, Hans Wennborg wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Tom Stellard <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can begin.  We can always use
>> > more testers, so if you are interested in testing, let me know.
>>
>> I had trouble building on Windows, getting errors in
>> AMDGPUGenSubtargetInfo.inc about 'uint64_t' being unrecognized. It
>> seems after r240285, FeatureWavefrontSize16 etc. changed from being
>> enumerators to uint64_t values.
>>
>> If I add "#include "llvm/Support/DataTypes.h"" to
>> AMDGPUMCTargetDesc.h, it builds. Can I go ahead and commit that to the
>> branch?
>
> Yes, that's fine.

Thanks. Committed in r240577.

I've uploaded a Windows installer based on that version to the sftp
with sha1 f8ead22e954933357edaab312df04ad1ad6fdab2.

Cheers,
Hans
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Dimitry Andric
On 24 Jun 2015, at 22:29, Hans Wennborg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Tom Stellard <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:11:26AM -0700, Hans Wennborg wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Tom Stellard <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can begin.  We can always use
>>>> more testers, so if you are interested in testing, let me know.
...
> Thanks. Committed in r240577.
>
> I've uploaded a Windows installer based on that version to the sftp
> with sha1 f8ead22e954933357edaab312df04ad1ad6fdab2.

Built and tested fine on FreeBSD.  Binaries uploaded:

SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = c4ecb25f1a4042432de9e77bd7bff80243d8f66b11cd4a1365aba52cbde35bc5
SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-i386-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = eef5b9aedbb0c54468d6c4f06267ae3bbdf97f49d91273ce16eedde83bb33db5

-Dimitry


_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

signature.asc (201 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Nikola Smiljanic
No failures on Fedora and Suse, binaries uploaded.

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Dimitry Andric <[hidden email]> wrote:
On 24 Jun 2015, at 22:29, Hans Wennborg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Tom Stellard <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:11:26AM -0700, Hans Wennborg wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Tom Stellard <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can begin.  We can always use
>>>> more testers, so if you are interested in testing, let me know.
...
> Thanks. Committed in r240577.
>
> I've uploaded a Windows installer based on that version to the sftp
> with sha1 f8ead22e954933357edaab312df04ad1ad6fdab2.

Built and tested fine on FreeBSD.  Binaries uploaded:

SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = c4ecb25f1a4042432de9e77bd7bff80243d8f66b11cd4a1365aba52cbde35bc5
SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-i386-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = eef5b9aedbb0c54468d6c4f06267ae3bbdf97f49d91273ce16eedde83bb33db5

-Dimitry


_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev



_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Dan Liew
Hi,

I'm not sure how important this will be but I found problems [1] with
the way the test-release script creates packages. Specifically it's
not using DESTDIR for the temporary tarball directory and instead is
using --prefix and it really shouldn't be doing that.

My observation so far has been that the only breakages I've seen are
that the LLVM CMake export files have broken paths in them in the
3.5.0 binary tarballs.

For some reason the LLVM 3.6.x release binary tarballs don't have the
CMake export files in. Any idea what happened there?

I'm going to a bit more testing myself but where are the release
candidate tarballs being uploaded to? I was expecting
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.6.2/rc1/ but there's nothing there.

[1] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150622/284436.html

Thanks,
Dan.
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Nikola Smiljanic
I think someone needs to move them there, we upload to ftp but I don't think it's publicly accessible.

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Dan Liew <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

I'm not sure how important this will be but I found problems [1] with
the way the test-release script creates packages. Specifically it's
not using DESTDIR for the temporary tarball directory and instead is
using --prefix and it really shouldn't be doing that.

My observation so far has been that the only breakages I've seen are
that the LLVM CMake export files have broken paths in them in the
3.5.0 binary tarballs.

For some reason the LLVM 3.6.x release binary tarballs don't have the
CMake export files in. Any idea what happened there?

I'm going to a bit more testing myself but where are the release
candidate tarballs being uploaded to? I was expecting
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.6.2/rc1/ but there's nothing there.

[1] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150622/284436.html

Thanks,
Dan.
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev


_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

sebastian.dressler
In reply to this post by Tom Stellard-3
Hi Tom,

I uploaded

    clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz = 7f13063eb18b299fb3928bd9da1daeab

Testing was OK.

Cheers,
Sebastian

2015-06-24 2:17 GMT+02:00 Tom Stellard <[hidden email]>:
Hi,

I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can begin.  We can always use
more testers, so if you are interested in testing, let me know.

-Tom


_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Daniel Sanders
In reply to this post by Tom Stellard-3
clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz
    All good

clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz
    One test-suite run passed. One still running.

clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz (cross compiling to various mips)
    All good.
________________________________________
From: Tom Stellard [[hidden email]]
Sent: 24 June 2015 01:17
To: [hidden email]
Cc: [hidden email]
Subject: 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged.  Testers needed.

Hi,

I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can begin.  We can always use
more testers, so if you are interested in testing, let me know.

-Tom

_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Dan Liew
In reply to this post by Nikola Smiljanic
On 27 June 2015 at 00:35, Nikola Smiljanic <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I think someone needs to move them there, we upload to ftp but I don't think
> it's publicly accessible.

Is there anyway to get access? I want to take a look at the packages.
The CMake files have been "broken in"/"missing from" previous releases
so it would be good to fix it this time.

There are several commits / patches (currently awaiting review) that
it would be good to back port to the branch that fix various issues.

* Make CMake files relocatable [2]
* Fix misuse of --prefix in the test-release.sh script [1]
* Don't export gtest in CMake files r240981


[1] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150622/284436.html
[2] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150629/284641.html
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Nikola Smiljanic
I think you need to send your public RSA key to Anton Korobeynikov.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Dan Liew <[hidden email]> wrote:
On 27 June 2015 at 00:35, Nikola Smiljanic <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I think someone needs to move them there, we upload to ftp but I don't think
> it's publicly accessible.

Is there anyway to get access? I want to take a look at the packages.
The CMake files have been "broken in"/"missing from" previous releases
so it would be good to fix it this time.

There are several commits / patches (currently awaiting review) that
it would be good to back port to the branch that fix various issues.

* Make CMake files relocatable [2]
* Fix misuse of --prefix in the test-release.sh script [1]
* Don't export gtest in CMake files r240981


[1] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150622/284436.html
[2] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150629/284641.html


_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Renato Golin-2
In reply to this post by Dan Liew
On 29 June 2015 at 20:19, Dan Liew <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Is there anyway to get access? I want to take a look at the packages.
> The CMake files have been "broken in"/"missing from" previous releases
> so it would be good to fix it this time.

So far, moving the files from uploads to the public website has been
the job of the release manager, as he/she has a wider view of the
issues and can make sure the release is only public when it's intended
to be.

I believe we shouldn't be able to push packages public for that very reason.

cheers,
-renato
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Daniel Sanders
In reply to this post by Daniel Sanders
clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz
    The second test run finally finished (the machine lacks an FPU). All good.
________________________________________
From: Daniel Sanders
Sent: 28 June 2015 18:51
To: Tom Stellard; [hidden email]
Cc: [hidden email]
Subject: RE: 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged.  Testers needed.

clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz
    All good

clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz
    One test-suite run passed. One still running.

clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz (cross compiling to various mips)
    All good.
________________________________________
From: Tom Stellard [[hidden email]]
Sent: 24 June 2015 01:17
To: [hidden email]
Cc: [hidden email]
Subject: 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged.  Testers needed.

Hi,

I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can begin.  We can always use
more testers, so if you are interested in testing, let me know.

-Tom

_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Dan Liew
Hi Tom,

I'd like to backport some fixes in LLVM trunk to the 3.6 branch. These
changes only effect the generation of CMake files and should not
change the generated binaries. The changes are

r240981
r241080

which need to be applied in order.

Is this okay?

Thanks,
Dan.
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Dan Liew
Hi,

I've taken a look at the binary tarballs for clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-*
that have been uploaded and observed the following:

* All uploaded tarballs include the generated CMake files apart from
``clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz``.
  These files (share/llvm/cmake/*.cmake) are missing in this tarball.

* Inside the Ubuntu tarball the directory is not consistently named
compared to the other tarballs. For example inside
``clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-x86_64-fedora21.tar.xz``
there is a directory named ``clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-x86_64-fedora21``.
Inside ``clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz``
the directory is named
``clang+llvm-3.6.2-rc1-x86_64-linux-gnu``.

* In the tarballs that do include the CMake files they are broken
because they contain absolute paths. r241080 needs to be back ported
in order to fix this.

* All tarballs are packaged incorrectly because --prefix is being
misused by ``test-release.sh``. I have a patch for this [1] which is
awaiting review (look at V2, the original patch doesn't work). You can
observe
  this by taking a look at ``include/llvm/Config/llvm-config.h``. It
contains paths that are almost certainly not going to exist on a
user's system. The patch will replace the temporary install directory
in files like these with ``/usr/local`` but will still place files in
the temporary install directory for tarballing.


@Ben Pope: Your uploaded binary tarball is the odd one out. Any idea
as to why the CMake files are missing and why the root directory name
inside the tarball is not consistent with the uploaded tarballs for
other platforms?

[1] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150629/285597.html
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.

Dan Liew
In reply to this post by Dan Liew
Hi Tom,

On 1 July 2015 at 09:38, Dan Liew <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> I'd like to backport some fixes in LLVM trunk to the 3.6 branch. These
> changes only effect the generation of CMake files and should not
> change the generated binaries. The changes are
>
> r240981

Just to note. If you were thinking of applying r240981, please hold
off for now. There appear to be some issues with it that need to be
resolved.

Thanks,
Dan.
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
[hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
12